In the war for talent itâ€™s a fact that many companies receive candidates they want, have in their database or have a â€œresume submissionâ€ from but donâ€™t ever speak with. Itâ€™s a fact that recruiters are very eager to help, and the technology they have been given is eons behind what Call Centers use. Itâ€™s also a fact that many CEOâ€™s will say their most important assets are their employees unless their an oil company or a general in an army.
So why are recruiters often so burdened with legacy technology in an underdeveloped ATS market? Why are recruiters given tools that assist HR in the on-boarding process and left with only a bastardized deployment of their ATSâ€™s feature rich recruiting functionality? Why is staffing typically given the smallest budget if the most important asset is their employees? And that the staffing budget is usually a fraction of the R&D budget? Maybe because the success of the investment in R&D is more predictable then the success in staffing?
We can try to adopt supply chain to recruiting to offer some predictability to our industry and offer relief to recruitingâ€¦ But how do you inventory something where no two â€œproductsâ€ (candidates) are the same? Furthermore the shelf life of a candidate is dynamic not only from the candidates situation, and interest; But their viability for their candidacy changes with each conversation. Inversely the situation of each organization changes with each new hire and is equally as dynamic.
In the dynamic environment that we work in the best solution to addressing these issues may be to treat recruiting like a call center and learn from the sales industry; With real-time technology, real-time response to real-time problems. This approach may not be the only way to skin this cat but offers many exciting possibilities to our situation. First and foremost it is important to remember that Companies have invested huge amounts of capital on what happens from the lead to the close in Call Centers and Staffing has the majority of its budgets invested in simply generating leads and on the personnel (recruiters). Learning from Call Centers in what happens in between is most likely the largest benefit for recruiting.
What exactly is a Virtual Call / Contact Centreâ€™?
Is a centralized office used for the purpose of receiving and transmitting a large volume of requests by telephone. A call centre is operated by a company to administer incoming product support or information inquiries from consumers. Outgoing calls for telemarketing, clientele, and debt collection are also made. In addition to a call centre, collective handling of letters, faxes, and e-mails at one location is known as a contact centre.
Most major businesses use call centers to interact with their customers. Examples include utility companies, mail order catalogue firms, and customer support for computer hardware and software. Most applicable to recruiting is the huge investment in this area into QED (Quality and Efficiency Driven) model that help identify exactly how to maximum Efficiency though call Quality and Quantity, and since recruiters live or die on the telephone it would seem directly applicable.
There is an almost transparent mapping that exist between call centers and recruiting organizations, particularly from the roles of personnel, and the ease of which the application could be configured. Like Call Centers, recruiting calls are either inbound â€œcandidates calling inâ€ or outbound â€œrecruiter is initiating the callâ€. Using Call Center queues and call management capabilities a lot of time and efficiency can be realized for recruiters.
In call centers we have Lead Generation Specialist â€œSourcersâ€ which are responsible for generating leads and ensuring a strong and steady pipeline of qualified leads â€œcandidatesâ€. Call center agents â€œrecruitersâ€ are responsible for qualify leads, selling the opportunity and expediting the â€œhand offâ€ of the qualified leads to Account Managers â€œHiring Managersâ€. Call Centers are run by a call center managers â€œstaffing Managerâ€ in our case that manages the entire operational structure. Lastly we have Contact Center Representatives which easily maps to (interview schedulers / staffing administrators) to help facilitate the sales (recruiting) lifecycle from an administration standpoint.
From an Recruitment Ontology perspective we could easily configure any Call Center Application to look and feel more like recruiting. Here is an example of how we could make a Call Center Application look like a Recruiting ATS:
The Benefit for Recruiting
In an environment where recruiters receive research (lead generation) they can easily be overwhelmed with the â€œneedle in a haystackâ€ principle. Progressive dialer technology and Call Blending of inbound and outbound call management could offer some relief. Call Centers have been solving this problem for decades, and if applied to recruiting enable the recruiter to reach unparalled levels of call volume and efficiency: Feeding them the best candidates at the best time in their call queue. To help ensure that the recruiter is not overwhelmed by this volume: Each would use native Call Center queue management functionality to put each call in the context of the conversation. Since different calls could be in regard different positions, Screen Pop & Call scripting technology alongside the Scripted Pitch and Qualification Call Branching presents the opportunity for the recruiter to reach maximum efficiency during maximum volume.
Call Script Branching in this process would allow the recruiter to quickly identify and assess skill matches based on answers to interview questions in lieu of using traditional legacy skill profiles or â€œunstructured notesâ€ found in ATS Systems. Utilizing Interview Call Branching lays out a perfect foundation for integrating interviewing methodologies like â€œSelecting Winnersâ€ or â€œHire Octaneâ€ with interview questions as scripts, that branch based on the answer to each question. Furthermore automatically capturing and storing the interview question outcomes without lengthy data entry procedures. Call Branching could also aid in determining if the candidate would be a better fit for another position based on the line of questioning mid interview, and queue that candidate to the assigned recruiter for that requisition.
Staffing Managers would have for the first time, the ability to directly aid recruiters by working with sourcing teams in building call queues and funneling massive amounts of leads directly into the recruiters pipeline. Staffing Managers can also identify pipeline lag in real-time from their desktop at home in a virtual environment and choose to generate more leads, increase the quality of the Call Scripts â€œInterview Questionnairesâ€ or simply choose to generate a Recruiting Campaign and redirect the efforts of the sourcing team in a few click. Additionally Staffing Managers would be armed with the appropriate information to justify better compensation packages for certain positions where the company isnâ€™t competitive or justify additional recruiting headcount to stay in pace with the number of positions and number of pipeline candidates in queue.
In Summary the most applicable and beneficial aspects of â€œRunning Recruiting like a Virtual Call / Contact Center” are listed as follows:
NOTE: David is open to discussing opportunities where he can make a direct and creative impact in a corporate staffing environment. Contact him directly at email@example.com